"The Grant Application Writer's Workbook"
can be purchased on-line!
CLICK HERE


EDITIONS NOW AVAILABLE

NIH SF 424
   Current 2009 format
   Shortened 2010 format
NSF FastLane
USDA
Successful Proposals to Any Agency
Click Here

This site best viewed at
1024 x 768

Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback

We Make The Difference in Your Ability to Acquire Research Funding
It is paradoxical that, while academicians are trained in depth to do research, they usually receive little or no formal training on how to support it with extramural grants. Grant Writers' Seminars and Workshops, LLC was founded by academicians, for academicians, to help overcome that problem.
The importance of the changes that NIH is implementing in the preparation and review of grant applications cannot be exaggerated. They collectively represent a true paradigm shift and include:

Switch to a 9-point evaluation scale.

Greater emphasis on quality of content and less on detailed description of what will be done.

Greater emphasis on funding the applications of New/Early Stage Investigators.

Standardization and shortening of reviews.

Greater emphasis on the fastest path to funding: decision to reapply or switch to a new idea.

Shortening of the length of the Research Plan, with elimination of sections for review of literature and presentation of preliminary data.

Linkage of sections of the application to each of the five core review criteria.

These innovations will completely change the formatting and review of NIH research-grant proposals, not only technically, but philosophically. We are not usually given to hyperbole, but in this case it is warranted: In our opinion, these are – without question – the most important and positive changes in the writing and review of grant applications since we first began submitting proposals to NIH in 1972. Let us be your guide in turning these changes to your advantage.


Grant-writing trainer with proven record returns to help faculty
BY CYNTHIA KING
WSU TODAY

Faculty Clifford Berkman and Jeffrey Ullman have received multiple research grants this year — success they can directly attribute to skills acquired in proposal-writing training from Stephen Russell. Russell will return to WSU for a third year to coach faculty in creating successful proposals during an upcoming seminar and workshop. While faculty members know their disciplines, they don’t always receive training in writing competitive proposals with the reviewer in mind, said chemistry professor Berkman. But this is a key element of Russell’s approach. "It’s a full mental workout," he said, "and my proposals are stronger for it." In addition to his own success, Ullman recalls evaluating proposals while sitting on a federal Environmental Protection Agency review panel where one proposal bore the hallmarks of the "Russell method." "It was obvious that person had taken his seminar," said the assistant professor/scientist in biological systems engineering. "The whole panel agreed it was one of the best proposals."

Russell is a winemaker and academician whose successful proposals continuously funded his cancer research for more than 25 years. As university department heads, he and his partner in Grant Writers’ Seminars and Workshops LLC began tutoring their faculty in grant writing; their success spawned their full-time business. Berkman has been awarded three grants this year for work on detection of prostate cancer cells, including $357,679 from the National Institutes of Health and $679,964 from the Washington State Life Science Discovery Fund.

Ullman just received $350,000 from the M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust to research contaminated river and lake sediments. He earlier was funded by the federal Department of Energy for $185,112.

"That proposal was not only funded," he said, "but publicly released results revealed our proposal was ranked first out of 59 competing submissions."

Article Courtesy of WSU Today, the faculty/staff/graduate student newspaper of Washington State University

© 2007 Grant Writers' Seminars & Workshops LLC.