Programs Include:




Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback


Mayo Clinic

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.5±0.6
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
4.8±0.5
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.7±0.5
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.6±0.6
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.6±0.6
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.6±0.6
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):

Excellent presentation, great speaker. Very concise, relevant information.
I believe this should be a required course for medical students and residents before they begin their research career. I found the content very helpful and wish I had had it earlier.
Great handout – allowed me to listen and not miss information.
Outstanding workshop!! Excellent presenter.
I thought it was well done and covered the most important points. I definitely picked up quite a few pieces of information that will help as I write my first manuscript. I’ll have the handout open as I write.
I have almost 50 peer-reviewed publications and still found some helpful tips.
Relevant course to my training. Excellent speaker. I admire his energy.
Outstanding. Will come back for grant-writing seminar in the fall.
Excellent presentation and superb speaker.

Testimonials



“I enjoyed this thoroughly. It was specific and helpful, encouraging and challenging. [The presenter’s] energy was amazing!”

“Excellent program!! I appreciated [the presenter’s] sense of humor and easy-going presentation style. Excellent material!”

“This was a fantastic overview of ‘how to’ develop, write and publish a scientific paper. I would recommend this course to anyone involved in publishing.”

“Good pace, good examples for reinforcemement.”

“Excellent presentation! I would recommend it to all of my colleagues.”