Programs Include:






Page Tools
Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback

University of Minnesota

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.7±0.6
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
5.0±0.0
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.8±0.4
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.8±0.5
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.9±0.4
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.8±0.5
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
•
 Excellent-again. I have been before and the update was worthwhile. The presenter is obviously an experienced, patient teacher. I appreciate his professional behavior and clarity with a very difficult topic.
•
 Illuminating, appropriate for all levels of experience.
•
 I attended this seminar three to four years ago, and it was critical in helping to revise a successful large grant application to the American Cancer Society. I wanted a refresher since the seminar was so valuable before, and I brought one of my grad students to help him improve his writing skills for upcoming fellowship applications.
•
 This was extremely helpful- practical skills that will really help. I always wanted to attend something like this.
•
 This seminar was very informative and extensive in the information offered.
•
 The peek provided to the “behind the scenes” or unspoken rules of the review process has been very eye-opening. Also, I appreciate the emphasis on importance of background work prior to writing and the need to allow sufficient time and be assertive about getting that time. The examples provided will be very helpful- thank you.
•
 Great presenter- very knowledgeable. Handouts were very helpful.
•
 Very informative and presented in a user friendly manner for multiple and varying lines of research. Speaker is engaging, easy to listen to and enjoyable.
•
 [The presenter] is clearly knowledgeable about the grant writing process. I learned some very specific guidelines and strategies that I will be able to apply immediately.
•
 Wonderful speaking pace and tone! Love the fun slides!
•
 Very informative and well organized. I have a much better understanding of how grants are reviewed and how to tailor my proposal to my reviewers.
•
 [The presenter's] presentation style and clarity was exceptional. He is quite knowledgeable of grant writing from the reviewer's perspective. This information is invaluable for those of us attempting to learn how to investigate the funding jungle ahead of us.
•
 Very good and logical presentation, very helpful.
•
 I loved this seminar. The material was presented in a clear and logical sense to help understand and critique writing a grant application.
•
 Thank you for this opportunity!

Testimonials


“[The presenter] had a powerful, yet friendly presentation style that is not only hugely informative, but also reassuring that obtaining funding is feasible. His willingness to answer questions at the end of the session on broader topics than just grant writing was a pleasant and appreciated boon to the seminar.”
Wayne State University

“One of the most dynamic and informative seminars I've attended at NIH. Hopefully there can be an increase in similar seminars in the future to accommodate all those who wish to attend. I would highly recommend this seminar to all.”
National Institutes of Health



© 2008 Grant Writers' Seminars & Workshops LLC.